Legal Opinion

United States v. Jaime Snyder

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 5, 2015No. 14-2784Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION *

2Per curiam

Jaime Lynn Snyder appeals from an order of the District Court denying her motion to amend her monthly restitution payments. For the reasons that follow, we will summarily affirm.

On October 17, 2011, the Government filed an Information in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, see D.C.Crim. No. ll-cr-00097, charging Snyder with copyright infringement, in violation of 17 U.S.C. § 506(a)(1)(A) and 18 U.S.C. § 2819(b)(1). Snyder waived indictment and pleaded guilty to the Information. In the plea agreement, Snyder agreed to restitution in the amount of…

3Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Rumsfeld v. PadillaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Murray v. BledsoeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  4. Jose Cardona v. B. BledsoeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  5. Ward v. ChavezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API