Legal Opinion
Murray v. Bledsoe
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 10, 2011No. 98-1252PublishedCited by 240 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
In November 2010, James Murray, a federal prisoner currently housed in the Special Management Unit (“SMU”) at the United States Penitentiary in Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, filed in the District Court a pro se petition for judicial review of a decision of the Federal Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”). Murray’s petition claimed that he has a constitutional right under the Ninth Amendment to choose his SMU cellmate. Before filing in the District Court, Murray had sought an administrative remedy from the BOP, alleging a right to choose his cellmate and requesting that the BOP allow him to do so. The…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Mark D. Tourscher v. Martin Horn, Secretary of the Pa. Dept. Of Corrections John McCullough Superintendent ,(d.c. Civil No. 98-Cv-00176j)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Spencer Harris v. James Greer, Dwight Brockmeyer, and Clarence CochranCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by240 opinions
- Ravanna Spencer v. BushCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Hilton Mincy v. Kenneth ChmielsewskiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Philadelphia Taxi Association v. Uber Technologies IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Williams v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Domingo Colon-Montanez v. Pennsylvania Healthcare ServicCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
235 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.