Young v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
STEADMAN, Associate Judge:
Appellant Reginald Young contends that his Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury was violated when a jury member failed to disclose that he was a convicted felon on life parole and that the prosecutor in Young’s case was also prosecuting the juror’s son in another case. After a post-trial hearing, the trial court found no actual juror bias. We see no basis to fault this determinative ruling and accordingly affirm. 1
I
On May 10, 1994, a jury found Young guilty of distribution and possession with intent to distribute cocaine. The jury also found Young’s…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kwong Hai Chew v. ColdingSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Lutwak v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. Oliver L. NorthCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Proudfoot v. Dan's Marine Service, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2002
- Sams v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Graham v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Kittle v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.