State v. Jackson

Rowlland R. Jackson appeals from a judgment convicting him of possession of cocaine base with intent to deliver. Jackson contends that the judgment should be reversed because the trial court accepted counsel's waiver of his right to poll the jury after the verdict was read, without making a finding *539that Jackson knowingly and voluntarily consented to the waiver. We disagree, and therefore affirm.

BACKGROUND

Jackson was charged with possession of cocaine base with intent to deliver, contrary to § 161.41(lm)(cm)l, STATS.1 The judge instructed the jury that its verdict must be reached unanimously,…