Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1881PublishedCited by 14 opinions

ERROR to the Circuit Court for Dunn County.

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

The plaintiff in error was tried and convicted upon an information charging him with rape. After verdict, and before judgment, the plaintiff in errpr moved the court to set aside the verdict and grant a new trial upon the following grounds: Upon the exception taken to the introduction of evidence; that the verdict is against the evidence; that the defendant’s counsel had not been given an opportunity to be present at the coming in of the jury and delivery of the verdict; and that the jury had been discharged before the rendering of the verdict. Upon this motion the defendant submitted *617the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1874
  2. Labar v. . KoplinNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
  3. People v. TrimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  4. State v. AustinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1858
  5. Rothbauer v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1868

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Havenor v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  2. MacKett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
  3. Spencer v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Anderson v. Arpin Hardwood Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  5. State v. BehnkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API