Legal Opinion

State v. Hereford

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided January 28, 1999No. 98-1270PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoggensack, J.

Marvin Hereford appeals an order of the circuit court denying his motion for a new trial pursuant to § 974.06, Stats. Hereford contends: (1) that he has a constitutional and a statutory right to be tried in the county where the crime was committed, which rights were violated by his trial counsel's successful motion to change venue because counsel did not secure Hereford's permission to seek a change of venue; (2) that he had a right to be present at the hearing at which venue was changed; and (3) that his postconviction counsel was ineffective for not objecting to the change of venue and for…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. State v. Escalona-NaranjoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. PitschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. OswaldCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
  2. State v. NonahalCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
  3. Hereford v. McCaughtryDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2000
  4. State Ex Rel. Mateo D.O. v. Circuit Court for Winnebago CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
  5. State v. OswaldCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API