Legal Opinion

Fees v. Ritchey

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 8, 1932No. 30,729PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*222The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This is an action to recover on a contract to drill an oil and gas well and to foreclose a lien on an oil and gas mining leasehold and equipment. Judgment was for plaintiff. One of the defendants appeals.

The facts are as follows: W. R. Ritchey, operating in his own name and as Ritchey Petroleum Company, owned a block of oil and gas leases in Coffey county, Kansas. He contracted with W. S. Fees to drill a well on his leases. The contract provided that he was to be paid in money for drilling this well. Ritchey was to furnish the pipe and casing…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Williams v. Otstot Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1929

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gaudreau v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  2. Wilkinson v. Pacific Mid-West Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  3. Oil Well Supply Co. v. First Nat. Bank of WinfieldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  4. Meyer v. LattaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955
  5. Meyer v. LattaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API