Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Latta

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 6, 1955No. 39,747PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wertz, J.:

This was an action to recover personal judgments and to enforce liens under the provisions of G. S. 1949, 55-207, against certain oil field equipment belonging to the leasehold owner and used by him in connection with his drilling of two oil wells on the leased property. From a judgment of the trial court holding the subject property not lienable under the mentioned statute, plaintiffs appeal.

Appellee John Latta, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was the owner of certain leases for the purposes of drilling for oil and gas. Defendant also…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bridgeport Machine Co. v. McKnabSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  2. Skinner v. Quadrangle Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  3. Meadows v. Bolin Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  4. Given v. CampbellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  5. Marion Machine, Foundry & Supply Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Adair v. Transcontinental Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  2. D Oil, Inc. v. BrungardtCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1988
  3. Rodgers v. Arapahoe Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  4. Fender Pipe & Supply, Inc. v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1980
  5. Meyer v. LattaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API