Legal Opinion

Moore v. Jewel Tea Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 27, 1969No. Gen. Nos. 52,605 and 52,613. (Consolidated.)PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burman

Frances L. Moore and her husband, Donald Grant Moore, brought suit against Jewel Tea Company, Drackett Products Company, The Drackett Company, and Heekin Can Company, all corporations, to recover damages caused by an explosion of a can of Drano which resulted in plaintiff, Frances Moore, losing the sight of both eyes. The jury awarded $900,000 compensatory damages to Mrs. Moore, $20,000 to Donald Grant Moore, whose cause of action grew out of the husband and wife relationship, and an additional $10,000 in punitive damages to Mrs. Moore. These verdicts were awarded against the defendants,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Suvada v. White Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Dunham v. Vaughan & Bushnell Mfg. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Metz v. Central Illinois Electric & Gas Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Bornstein v. Metropolitan Bottling Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  5. Nichols v. NoldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. MaloneTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Wangen v. Ford Motor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Palmer v. AH Robins Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  4. Lunsford v. MorrisTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1979

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API