Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Draganoff

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided June 17, 1964PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harry G. Herman, S.

The law firm, of Wolf, Popper, Boss, Wolf & Jones, as attorneys in fact for alien nonresident distributees of this decedent, residing in Bulgaria, requests that the distributive shares of said distributees be paid directly to the attorneys in fact for transmission to Bulgaria and that said shares not be deposited with the Commissioner of Finance of Westchester County, in view of the removal of Bulgaria from Treasury Department Circular No. 655, which prohibits transmittal of Federal funds to the countries listed therein.

In support .of its endeavor to resist application of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kolovrat v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. In re the Accounting of GreenNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. In re the Estate of WeidbergNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
  4. Ioannou v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. In re the Estate of BoldNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. General Mills Operations, LLC v. Five Star Custom Foods, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
  2. In re the Estate of DraganoffNew York Surrogate's Court · 1965
  3. Lamb v. Estate of SzaboConnecticut Superior Court · 1967
  4. In re the Estate of DraganoffNew York Surrogate's Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API