Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Draganoff
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided April 30, 1965PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Harry G. Herman, S.
This is a motion for reargument of the court’s decision (Matter of Draganoff, 43 Misc 2d 233), which denied the application of the law firm of Wolf, Popper, Boss, Wolf & J ones, as attorneys in fact for alien nonresident distributees, for payment of their shares directly to the attorneys in fact for transmission to Bulgaria, and which directed the deposit of the distributive shares with the Commissioner of Finance of Westchester County (Surrogate’s Ct. Act, § 269-a).
When that issue was originally submitted to the court, counsel on both sides stated to the court that in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In re the Accounting of GreenNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- In re the Estate of WeidbergNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
- In re the Accounting of TerryNew York Surrogate's Court · 1951
- In re the Accounting of GeffenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1951
- In re the Estate of BoldNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lamb v. Estate of SzaboConnecticut Superior Court · 1967
- In re the Estate of DraganoffNew York Surrogate's Court · 1965
- In re the Estate of ShefsickNew York Surrogate's Court · 1966