Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Bold

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided February 14, 1940PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Foley, S.

The question presented for determination here is whether upon the evidence the surrogate shall direct the transmission of the moneys payable to a distributee, or whether they shall be decreed to be paid into court pursuant to the recent amendment made to section 269 of the Surrogate’s Court Act.

The decedent died intestate and his estate was administered by the public administrator. He left a father as his sole next of kin. He resides in Odessa in the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, formerly known as Russia. The approximate amount distributable to him is $1,500. He executed a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Santovincenzo v. EganSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. In re the Estate of LandauNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Estate of GogabashveleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. In re the Accounting of MulliganNew York Surrogate's Court · 1951
  3. In Re Estate of UrlNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  4. In re the Accounting of DoboNew York Surrogate's Court · 1953
  5. In re the Estate of KleinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API