Legal Opinion

City of Phoenix v. Arizona Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 11, 1995No. 1 CA-TX 93-0008PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NOYES, Judge.

The tax court granted summary judgment to Appellee Arizona Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc. (“Budget”), holding that refueling charges paid by customers who returned cars with less than full gas tanks were not taxable as gross income from Budget’s car rental business. We conclude that refueling charges are an integral part of Budget’s car rental business, and therefore taxable as gross income from that business. We reverse the tax court, vacate its opinion, and remand with directions to enter judgment in favor of the City.

The City of Phoenix audited Budget for the period April…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ebasco Services Inc. v. Arizona State Tax CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Libra Group, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  3. Northern Indiana Public Service Co. v. Citizens Action Coalition of Indiana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. State Tax Commission v. Holmes & Narver, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Freund v. Avis Rent-A-Car System, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Walden Books Co. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  2. ADVO System, Inc. v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  3. Marriott Corp. v. State ex rel. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  4. Stedman v. PolomskiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API