Legal Opinion

Marriott Corp. v. State ex rel. Department of Revenue

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 12, 1997No. 1 CA-TX 96-0016Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GERBER, Judge.

The Marriott Corporation and its successor Marriott Management Services Corporation (collectively Marriott) appeal from the tax court’s ruling that Marriott was not entitled to a refund of restaurant transaction privilege taxes. Marriott claims that the payments it received from the Theodore Roosevelt Council of the Boy Scouts of America (Council) were tax deductible because providing, preparing, and serving food to the Council’s camps constituted, in its view, “[sjales to a person engaged in business classified under the restaurant classification if the items sold are to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Tax Commission v. Holmes & Narver, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1976
  2. City of Phoenix v. Arizona Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  3. State ex rel. Arizona Department of Revenue v. Phoenix Lodge No. 708, Loyal Order of Moose, Inc.Arizona Tax Court · 1994
  4. Stillwell Grand Prix Motors, Inc. v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API