Legal Opinion

Hill v. National Life Accident Ins. Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 1, 1935No. 4965PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taliaferro, Judge.

In the year 1926 defendant issued to plaintiff its endowment, sick, and accident policy,wherein appears the following provision, viz.

“If the insured shall lose both hands at or above the wrist, or both feet at or above the-ankle, or one hand and one foot at or above the wrist and ankle, or if the insured shall, permanently lose the sight of both eyes, as a result either of accident or illness, not caused or contributed to■ by venereal disease,. * * * this Policy shall thereupon mature' and the Company shall be liable for double-the sum payable in event of death from natural…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crowe v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
  2. Goldstein v. . Standard Accident Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. Calhoon v. Meridian Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Cates v. Jefferson Standard Life Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1935

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. National Life Accident Ins. Co. v. DaviesAlabama Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Glover v. National Life & Accident InsuranceAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1960
  3. National Life Accident Ins. Co. v. DaviesAlabama Court of Appeals · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API