National Life Accident Ins. Co. v. Davies
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion
On Rehearing
In brief on application for rehearing counsel states: “The Court here, in order that the insured might receive the weekly benefits which will probably exceed the amount to be paid for the loss of both feet, has unconsciously destroyed the coverage now held by thousands of people in the State who have policies which contain the same provision as designated in the policy sued on as Section C. In many of these policies there will not be any other provisions under which they can receive any benefits, so, they will lose all, because of this decision.”
We certainly did not intend that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Goldstein v. . Standard Accident Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Hill v. National Life Accident Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1935