Legal Opinion

Glover v. National Life & Accident Insurance

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California

Decided February 1, 1960No. Civ. A. No. 67Published

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, P. J.

In her complaint the plaintiff seeks to recover from the defendant on an insurance policy by the terms of which the defendant agreed to pay to plaintiff the sum of $2,000 if she should suffer the loss of the sight of both eyes as a result of injury or disease sustained after the date of the issuance of the policy.

She alleges that “. . . during the continuance of the contract she suffered the loss of the sight of both eyes.” (Par. VII.)

In its answer the defendant denies that the plaintiff suffered the loss of the sight of both eyes during the life of the contract.

Stipulation

The following facts…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Humphreys v. Nat'l Benefit Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  2. Hill v. National Life Accident Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API