Legal Opinion
McLevis v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 15, 1926No. 24,885PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
Action on a policy of fire insurance tried without a jury. After a decision for plaintiffs, defendant appeals from the order denying its motion for amended findings or for a new trial. The State Bank of Willow River appears in the case as plaintiff to assert its rights as assignee of its co-plaintiff, McLevis. For convenience we will refer to the former as the bank and the latter as plaintiff.
The policy covered a relatively new dwelling. There was a total destruction of the building, resulting in a loss to the full amount of the policy, $3,000. The sole defense is put upon the falsity of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Parsons, Rich & Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Andes Insurance v. FishIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
- Banner Laundry Co. v. Great Eastern Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Collins v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Graham v. . Fireman's Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- RCA Photophone Inc. v. HuffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Craigmile v. SorensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- National Aviation Underwriters, Inc., D/B/A National Insurance Underwriters v. Raymond F. Fischer and Fischer Construction Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Proprietors Insurance Co. v. Northwestern National Bank of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985