Collins v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
y/ App.eal by defendant from an order of the district court for Sibley / county, Edson, J., .presiding, granting a new trial after verdict directed for defendant, in an action to recover $600 on the policy mentioned in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGilpillan, C. J.
This is an action on a policy of insurance upon a dwelling-house and log barn, and sheds connected therewith, situate on section 31, township 114, range 25. Upon the trial the court below directed a verdict for the defendant, and after such verdict, upon plaintiff’s motion, granted a new trial, and from the order granting it defendant appeals. On the case made at the trial it was *441impossible for the plaintiff to recover, for two reasons:- First. The house, barn, and sheds, for a loss upon which a recovery is sought, were not on section 31; but plaintiff claimed at the trial, and gave some…
2Cited by19 opinions
- Syndicate Ins. v. BohnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
- Parsons, Rich & Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Mechanics & Traders Insurance v. Mutual Real Estate & Blg. Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
- Aetna Insurance Co., of Hartford v. BrannonTexas Supreme Court · 1905
- Home Fire Insurance v. KuhlmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.