Legal Opinion

Craigmile v. Sorenson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 30, 1956No. 36,853PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Knutson, Judge.

This case arises out of an attempt by defendants as vendors to cancel a contract for deed to sell certain real estate to plaintiffs as vendees. It has been here on two prior occasions. Craigmile v. Sorenson, 239 Minn. 383, 58 N. W. (2d) 865, and Craigmile v. Soren-son, 241 Minn. 222, 62 N. W. (2d) 846. The facts stated in our prior decisions will not be repeated except insofar as it seems necessary to a determination of the issues now before us.

Briefly, the facts are that on April 16, 1951, defendants, husband and wife, as vendors, contracted to sell a tract of farmland in…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Parsons, Rich & Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. Johnson v. National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  3. Johnson v. Northern Minnesota Land & Investment Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  4. Milliken v. WoodwardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900
  5. Schroedel v. Humboldt Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Space Center, Inc. v. 451 CORP.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Transamerican Insurance Co. v. Austin Farm Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Campbell v. Glenwood Hills Hospitals, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  4. Coddon v. YoungkrantzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  5. Drewitz v. Motorwerks, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API