Law v. McLaughlin
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
KERRIGAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff sold certain properties in 1924 which he had acquired before March 1, 1913, and which are known as the Marina properties. The government contends that plaintiff made a profit on the sale and has assessed and collected, on that basis, an additional tax from plaintiff; the payment of it was accompanied by formal'notice of protest on the part of the taxpayer. Plaintiff contends that he not only made no profit on the sale, but in fact suffered such a loss that his entire tax for the year 1924 should be eliminated. He is suing for a refund of both the original…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Eisner, Internal Revenue Collector v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Weiss v. StearnSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- United States v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Wenban Estate, Inc. v. HewlettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Railroad CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1939
- State v. Swift & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1945
- State v. Lone Star Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Tex-Penn Oil Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1936
- Champlin Refining Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.