Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Saylesville Cheese Manufacturing Co. v. Zimmerman
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided March 3, 1936PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.
It is conceded on both sides that if sec. 185.08 (9), Stats., is a valid enactment, the circuit court correctly held that the Saylesville Company was not entitled to a change of venue; on the other hand, it is conceded that if said section is not a valid enactment, the Saylesville Company was entitled to a change of venue and the writ should issue.
Sec. 185.08 (9) provides : “The proper place of trial of any action by or against an association [co-operative] under the foregoing provisions of"this section shall be the county where such association has its principal office, according to its…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Power Manufacturing Co. v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Liberty Warehouse Co. v. Burley Tobacco Growers' Co-Operative Marketing Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Northern Wisconsin Co-operative Tobacco Pool v. BekkedalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
- Watertown Milk Producers Co-operative Ass'n v. Van Camp Packing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
- State ex rel. National Cheese Producers Federation v. FoleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
3Cited by6 opinions
- Weco Products Co. v. Reed Drug Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- State ex rel. Ford Hopkins Co. v. Mayor of WatertownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- Kalb v. LuceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
- State Ex Rel. Cairy v. Iowa Co-Operative Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
- State ex rel. Wisconsin Development Authority v. DammannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.