Legal Opinion

Northern Wisconsin Co-operative Tobacco Pool v. Bekkedal

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1924PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed November 13, 1923:

Owen, J.

The question which first should be considered is whether the plaintiff is entitled to equitable relief pre*580venting the defendants from, interfering with the contracts existing between the plaintiff and its numerous members. It is to be borne in mind that the Bekkedal firm has for thirty years been engaged in the tobacco business in this state, during which time it has purchased the tobacco crops of many growers who had become members of the plaintiff corporation and had entered into contracts to sell and deliver their 1922 and four…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Minnesota v. Northern Securities Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Rice v. . ManleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  3. Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. Gardiner Dairy Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1908
  4. Beekman v. MarstersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  5. Poultry Producers of Southern California, Inc. v. BarlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Tigner v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. United States v. Rock Royal Co-Operative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Pure Milk Products Cooperative v. National Farmers OrganizationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Asbury Hospital v. Cass CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Weco Products Co. v. Reed Drug Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1937

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API