Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Com'rs of Land Office v. Lewis

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 18, 1946No. 31992PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

Plaintiff sued as the owner of 20 acres of land in section 1, twp. 8 south, range 5 east, in Marshall county, and alleged that a certain judgment of record in favor of the Commissioners of the Land Office of the State of Oklahoma appeared or purported to be a lien against his land, but that such judgment was ancient and obsolete and ineffective as a lien and should be canceled as a cloud on his title.

The commissioners contend that the money judgment in question is a continuing valid and subsisting lien.

Essential facts are that in 1928 the commissioners upon a loan of money took a real estate…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Minnesota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. United States v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Custer v. McCutcheonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. United States v. HellardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nilsen v. Ports of Call Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  2. Petition of University Hospitals AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  3. Charles Banfield Company v. State Ex Rel. FallisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  4. State ex rel. Commissioners of Land Office v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  5. State ex rel Oklahoma Employment Sec. Com. v. DeanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API