Legal Opinion

Knox v. Board of School Directors of Susquenita School District

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 28, 2005No. 55 MAP 2004PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice CASTILLE.

In this appeal, this Court examines whether the job removal protections outlined in Section 10-1089(c) of the Public School Code of 1949 (the “Code”), 24 P.S. § 1-101 et seq.,1 which governs school “business administrators,” apply where a business administrator, who worked without a written contract of employment for a number of years, is informed by the school *174district that his employment is being terminated at the end of the fiscal year. A divided panel of the Commonwealth Court held that Section 10 — 1089(c) had no application at all because it governs only written…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Geary v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan v. EnglishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Shick v. ShireySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Commonwealth v. Gilmour Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. O'ROURKE v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. McClinticSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Paul Montemuro v. Jim Thorpe Area School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2024
  3. First Union National Bank v. Estate of ShevlinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. School District of Philadelphia v. Department of EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Port Authority of Allegheny County v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API