Legal Opinion
In Re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust Litigation
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 22, 2005No. CIV.A. 05-666, MDL No. 1682Published
1Opinion of the Court
401 F.Supp.2d 451 (2005)
In re: HYDROGEN PEROXIDE ANTITRUST LITIGATION.
This Document Relates To: Direct Purchaser Action.
No. CIV.A. 05-666, MDL No. 1682.
United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.
November 22, 2005.
Mario N. Alioto, Trump Alioto Trump & Prescott, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Bernard Lawrence Winery, Plaintiff.
D. Jarrett Arp, Washington, DC, for Akzo Nobel Chemicals International B.V., Akzo Nobel, Inc., EKA Chemicals, Inc., Defendants.
Anthony J. Bolognese, Bolognese & Associates, LLC, Philadelphia, for Finch Pruyn and Company, Inc., Plaintiff.
W. Joseph Bruckner, Lockridge…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.