Legal Opinion
Windiate v. Lorman
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 8, 1926No. Docket No. 38PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.
John Windiate filed this bill. Later his death was suggested and the suit revived in the name of the administrator. The bill, alleging -cloud on title, a recorded option, sought its removal. The option:
“In consideration of one dollar, and other valuable considerations, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, I, John Windiate, of Pontiac, Michigan, agree with Janette Lorman, of West Bloomfield, that if I ever desire to sell, or if my heirs or devisees shall ever desire to sell, the lands hereinafter described, I will give to Janette Lorman, her heirs, devisees and assigns the first…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gustin v. Union School-DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Buck v. WalkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- Rong v. HallerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- State v. HolmesMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Simpson v. CookSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Windiate v. LelandMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Lantis v. CookMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
- Old Mission Peninsula School District v. FrenchMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
- Stenke v. Masland Development Co., Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- Locklear v. TuckerIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.