Legal Opinion

Windiate v. Lorman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1926No. Docket No. 38PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

John Windiate filed this bill. Later his death was suggested and the suit revived in the name of the administrator. The bill, alleging -cloud on title, a recorded option, sought its removal. The option:

“In consideration of one dollar, and other valuable considerations, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, I, John Windiate, of Pontiac, Michigan, agree with Janette Lorman, of West Bloomfield, that if I ever desire to sell, or if my heirs or devisees shall ever desire to sell, the lands hereinafter described, I will give to Janette Lorman, her heirs, devisees and assigns the first…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gustin v. Union School-DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Buck v. WalkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  3. Rong v. HallerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  4. State v. HolmesMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Simpson v. CookSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Windiate v. LelandMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Lantis v. CookMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Old Mission Peninsula School District v. FrenchMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Stenke v. Masland Development Co., Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Locklear v. TuckerIdaho Supreme Court · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API