Legal Opinion

State v. Murtagh

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 2007No. S-11988, S-12007PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION MATTHEWS, Justice.

MATTHEWS, Justice.

The question in this case is whether certain provisions of the Alaska Victims' Rights Act are unconstitutional. We conclude that they are because they interfere with criminal defense investigations without adequate justification.

I. PROCEEDINGS

This case was initiated by criminal defense attorneys John Murtagh, James McComas, Cynthia Strout, and Sidney Billingslea and defense investigator Harry Taylor (collectively referred to in this opinion as Murtagh), on behalf of themselves and their present and future clients. They challenged certain provisions…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Brooks v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Doe v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Valentine v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Resource Development Council for Alaska, Inc.; Alaska Trucking Association, Inc.; Alaska Miners Association, Inc.; Associated General Contractors of Alaska; Alaska Chamber; and Alaska Support Industry Alliance v. Kevin Meyer, in his Official Capacity as Lt. Governor of the State of Alaska; Gail Fenumiai, in her Capacity as Direction of the Alaska Division of Elections; the State of Alaska, Division of Elections; and Vote Yes for Alaska's Fair Share, Vote Yes for Alaska's Fair Share v. Resource Development Council for Alaska, Inc.; Alaska Trucking Association, Inc.; Alaska Miners Association, Inc.; Associated General Contractors of Alaska; Alaska Chamber; and Alaska Support Industry Alliance v. Kevin Meyer, in his Official Capacity as Lt. Governor of the State of Alaska; Gail Fenumiai, in her Capacity as Direction of the Alaska Division of Elections; the State of Alaska, Division of ElectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Holden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2008
  5. State v. BlazasNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API