State v. Blazas
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
ESPINOSA, J.A.D.
The “meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense” guaranteed by the Federal and New Jersey Constitutions is denied when the prosecution substantially interferes with a defendant’s ability to secure witness testimony. In this case, the government conduct alleged did not result in the denial of witness testimony but, rather, in the denial of access to the witness for interview by the defense. Such allegations, if true, would be proof of substantial interference with defendant’s constitutionally guaranteed right of access to…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Crane v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. GREGORY A. MARTINEZ (17-05-0586, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
- State v. Oscar RamirezSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2022