Legal Opinion

State v. Empire American Bail Bonds, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 24, 1998No. 1 CA-CV 97-0426PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOCI, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Empire American Bail Bonds, Inc. (“Empire”) appeals from the trial court’s order denying its request for a new form of judgment. The issue presented by this appeal is whether the state must give notice to the surety of the filing of a proposed form of judgment forfeiting the bail bond. We hold that Rule 58(a), Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, requires such notice. The trial court erred in signing the judgment without first requiring proof of such notice. We therefore vacate the trial court’s order denying Empire’s request for a new form of judgment and remand…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  2. Sims v. RyanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Haroutunian v. Valueoptions, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  2. State v. Eazy Bail BondsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  3. Haroutunian v. ValueoptionsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  4. Haroutunian v. Valueoptions, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API