Legal Opinion

State v. Eazy Bail Bonds

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 22, 2010No. 1 CA-CV 09-0278PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWANN, Judge.

¶ 1 Eazy Bail Bonds, Hurricane Bail Bonds, and International Fidelity Insurance Company (collectively, “appellants”) appeal from the superior court’s judgment forfeiting a bail bond. We hold pursuant to Ariz. R. Sup.Ct. 31 that because appellants did not appear through counsel in the superior court, they effectively failed to appear at all. Because they failed to appear, appellants were unable as a matter of law to satisfy their burden of proof on the issue of good cause for the defendant’s failure to appear in the underlying criminal case.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Glaze v. MarcusCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  2. Ramada Inns, Inc. v. Lane and Bird Advertising, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Boydston v. Strole Development Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1998
  4. In Re CreasyArizona Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. Arizona BailmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API