Hall v. Hodgkins
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM: *
Aric Hall appeals the district court’s dismissing his Bivens claims against the defendants as barred by res judicata. Specifically, he attempts to distinguish the cause of action in this claim from those in his two prior claims against defendants or them privies. In the memorable, if brief, words of Michigan Judge J.H. Gillis: “He didn’t. We couldn’t.” For that and the following reasons, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Aric Hall was a member of the Civil Air Patrol (“CAP”), a nonprofit and federally chartered corporation. In prior…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Dino Cinel v. Harry F. Connick, Individually and as District Attorney for the Parish of Orleans, State of LouisianaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Manuel M. Fernandez-Montes v. Allied Pilots Association, Fred Vogel, and C.R. PatyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by114 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Long v. GSDMIdea City, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- Pike v. Office of Alcohol & Tobacco ControlDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2015
- United States ex rel. Parikh v. Citizens Medical CenterDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
- Van Duzer v. U.S. Bank National Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2014
- North Cypress Medical Center Operating Co. v. Cigna HealthcareDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2011
109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.