Legal Opinion

Cowherd Development Co. v. Littick

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 12, 1951No. 42059PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WESTHUES, C.

[ 347] This is an action brought tinder the Declaratory Judgment Act, Chapter 527, R. S. Mo. 1949. The question presented is whether restrictions in Hinkle Place, Kansas City, Missouri, were extended for a period of 25 years from September 1, 1946, as to all of the lots or whether such restrictions were extended only as to part of the lots in Hinkle Place. The trial court decreed that the restrictions had been extended as to all of the lots. Plaintiffs who by their suit sought to have certain lots exempted have appealed.

Hinkle Place was platted as an addition in Kansas City,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rombauer v. Compton Heights Christian ChurchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  2. Benner v. Tacony Athletic Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Booker v. Old Dominion Land Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1948
  4. City of Sedalia ex rel. Gilsonite Construction Co. v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  5. Hisey v. Eastminster Presbyterian ChurchMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Montoya v. BarrerasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Steve Vogli & Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  3. Riley v. BoyleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  4. H. J. Griffith Realty Co. v. Hobbs Houses, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Barnes v. Anchor Temple AssociationMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API