Legal Opinion
Tokarcik v. Forest Hills School District
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 8, 1981No. Nos. 80-2844/5PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ADAMS, Circuit Judge.
We are once again asked to define the rights of handicapped school children and the obligations of school districts, as well as the roles of courts and agencies, under the Education for All Handicapped Children Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1401 et seq. [hereinafter EAHCA].1 First, however, it is necessary to decide if an appealable order exists. If so, we must ascertain whether the plaintiffs’ claim is timely filed. Once these threshold requirements are satisfied, we are required to determine whether clean intermittent catheterization falls within the statutory…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Southeastern Community College v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- S.H., Individually and on Behalf of I.H. v. State-Operated School District of the City of NewarkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Irving Independent School District v. TatroSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bernardsville Board of Education v. J.H., Individually and on Behalf of Their Minor Son, J.H. E.H., Individually and on Behalf of Their Minor Son, J.H. J.H., IndividuallyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Jeremy H. v. Mount Lebanon School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Joseph Spiegler v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.