Legal Opinion
Rousseau v. City of Philadelphia
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 6, 1984No. Civ. A. 81-1947PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
VANARTSDALEN, District Judge.
Plaintiff has asserted a number of state and federal claims that essentially seek to hold the City of Philadelphia (the City) 1 responsible for inadequate and unworkmanlike construction by a private contractor who sought to rehabilitate plaintiff’s property utilizing funds provided through a federal loan program. Beginning in 1977, plaintiff, undertook the rehabilitation effort in question with the assistance of low interest loan funds made available by the Department of Housing and Urban Develop ment (HUD) under the Section 312 loan…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sierra Club v. PenaDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1996
- RCJ Medical Services, Inc. v. Bonta´California Court of Appeal · 2001
- Chalfin v. Beverly Enterprises, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
- Northern Indian Housing & Development Council v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
- Town of Secaucus v. United States Department of TransportationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.