Legal Opinion

Royal Bank v. Goldschmidt

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 15, 1906PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, rendered in the Municipal Court of the city of New York, second 'district-, borough of Manhattan.

1Opinion of the CourtGildebsleeve, J.

The pleadings are in writing. • The complaint alleges the making of a promissory note by defendant, payable to one Weitzenblum, for $200; its endorsement by Weitzenblum and its delivery before maturity to plaintiff; its nonpayment at maturity and protest. The answer sets up, as a “ separate and distinct defense,” that “ defendant made and executed' the note in the said complaint mentioned without consideration therefor and for the accommodation of the payee thereof;” and that, without the knowledge or consent of defendant, plaintiff made an agreement with Weitzenblum whereby the time for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Garrett v. WoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. North British & Mercantile Insurance v. ParnellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  2. Prinstein v. De RosaAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API