Prinstein v. De Rosa
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal by the defendant from an order of tbe Municipal Court of tbe city of New York, borough of the Bronx, second district.
1Opinion of the CourtPlatzek, J.
The facts in this case are not disputed. On March 8, 1910, the plaintiff recovered a judgment against the defendant by default. Subsequently, this default was opened, and the case set down for trial, the judgment to stand as security. The case came on for trial on June 30, 1910,-and the defendant requested an adjournment until September twenty-second. The parties thereupon entered into a written stipulation regarding the adjournment. This stipulation is not contained in the record, but the order appealed from states it to be as follows: “It was agreed as a condition for the granting of an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Spiegelman v. Union Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- Koransky v. GreenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Dorfman v. HirschfieldNew York Supreme Court · 1907
- Royal Bank v. GoldschmidtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1906