Legal Opinion
Riordan v. Clarke
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided December 7, 1999No. WD 56743PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL M. SPINDEN, Judge.
In this declaratory judgment action, the circuit court issued a summary judgment holding that, pursuant to § 86.213.2, RSMo 1994, the St. Louis Board of Police Commissioners was obligated to pay police officers who were members of the Board of Trustees of the Police Retirement System of St. Louis their regular salaries, up to 30 days, for “travel time” to all functions authorized by the board of trustees. The circuit court based its ruling on § 86.213.2’s mandating “travel time,” a term that the circuit court found the St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department used to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Spradlin v. City of FultonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
- Fenberg v. GogginMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Nolte v. WittmaierMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- State Ex Rel. County of St. Charles v. MehanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of University City v. AT & T Wireless ServicesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- State Ex Rel. Nixon v. Premium Standard Farms, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- Riordan v. ClarkMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- Michelle Latray as Receiver of the Assets of Clifton Boatright for the Benefit of Judgment Creditors W.L. Roberts, Dana Roberts, Erin Leigh Roberts, and Katelyn Robert Gonzales v. Colony Insurance Company D/B/A Colony Specialty Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2021
- State v. Robert Mendoza, Jr., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2014