Legal Opinion

Riordan v. Clark

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 13, 2001No. WD 58977PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, Judge.

This is the second appeal from a declaratory judgment action that sought a determination of whether statutory language meant to compensate active St. Louis police officers who served on the department’s retirement board for time spent traveling to and from, and attending out-of-town meetings. Appellants, the Board of Trustees of the Police Retirement System of St. Louis, and trustees James Rior-dan and John Gaffigan, individually, appeal from a trial court judgment granted in favor of respondents, the St. Louis Board of Police Commissioners, and the members of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. State Ex Rel. County of St. Charles v. MehanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Oetker v. SherwoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Riordan v. ClarkeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. State ex rel. County of St. Charles v. City of St. PetersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sheehan v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Stolov v. Jackson County School District C-1 of Hickman MillsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Jerry Bennett Masonry Contractor, Inc. v. CROSSLAND CONST. CO., INC.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API