Legal Opinion

Spradlin v. City of Fulton

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 22, 1998No. 80634PublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM RAY PRICE, Jr., Judge.

This case involves a series of closed meetings conducted by the city council of Fulton in connection with a proposal by a private investment group to purchase land and develop a public golf course to be financed *257through neighborhood improvement bonds. The trial court found that: 1) the city council violated section 610.021(2) because the closed meetings did not relate to the leasing of real estate by a public governmental body; 2) an award of attorney’s fees was not warranted because the city council did not purposely violate the open meetings law; and 8) an…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. State v. BurkhardtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  3. Abrams v. Ohio Pacific ExpressSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  4. Bank of Washington v. McAuliffeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  5. Staley v. Missouri Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. State v. RoweSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  2. Missouri National Education Ass'n v. Missouri State Board of EducationMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Akins v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
  4. State of Missouri v. Justin Floyd Eugene JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
  5. City of Wellston v. SBC Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2006

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API