Lane Ex Rel. Lane v. Paschall
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.
The defendant, at the close of the plaintiff’s evidence, made motion for judgment as in case of nonsuit. The motion was overruled and defendant excepted. Defendant did not renew his motion at the close of all the evidence, C. S., 567, nor did defendant, under O. S., 565, at the close of all the evidence in apt time request the court in writing to instruct the jury that in view of all the evidence the first issue should be answered “No,” and the second issue “Yes.” We think defendant is precluded from raising the question that the evidence on the part of the plaintiff was not sufficient to be…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fulcher v. Pine Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Allen v. . GaribaldiSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Holt v. Oval Oak Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Mahaffey v. Forsyth Furniture Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Gibson Ex Rel. Black v. Leaksville Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Goodman v. . GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Fincher v. RhyneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Gold v. . KikerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Chunn v. McRaeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Carolina Timber Management Company, Inc. v. BellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.