Legal Opinion

Gibson Ex Rel. Black v. Leaksville Cotton Mills

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 22, 1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The defendant introduced no evidence, and at the close of plaintiff’s evidence made a motion for judgment as in case of nonsuit. C. S., 567. The motion was granted and plaintiff excepted, assigned error and appealed to this Court. We think the court below should not have allowed the motion.

Gibson was a youth, fourteen years old. One Murray was his boss, or superintendent, and the evidence on the part of plaintiff is to the effect that he did not instruct him as to the danger. Gibson testified, in part, as follows: “Mr. Murray told me to do what I was doing at the time I got hurt. I was up on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dolner v. The MonticelloU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1870
  2. Roth v. Northern Pacific Lumbering Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1889
  3. McGowan v. La Plata Mining & Smelting Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado · 1882

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lane Ex Rel. Lane v. PaschallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API