Legal Opinion
Diaz ex rel. Pena v. Apfel
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 23, 1998No. 96 Civ. 1581(LAK)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KAPLAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Emilia Diaz, on behalf of her minor son Dauris Pena, brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3) challenging the final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying her application for disabled child Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) disability benefits. Pending before the Court is the Commissioner’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants Commissioner’s motion and dismisses the complaint.
Background
Prior Proceedings
On April 29, 1993…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Edwind F. PRATTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Gary BEAUVOIR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Debbie Quinones O/b/o Jennifer Quinones v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Justin Nelson v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Carballo Ex Rel. Cortes v. ApfelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Maldonado Ex Rel. Maldonado v. ApfelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999