Legal Opinion

Eddy v. Township of Lee

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1888PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from Midland. (Hart, J.) Bill to decree taxes illegal and void, and to restrain their collection. Complainants appeal from decree dismissing bill on demurrer. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

On February 1, 1887, the complainants filed their bill of complaint in the # circuit court for the county of Midland, in chancery, to enjoin the collection of certain'taxes assessed and levied upon the general tax roll of the township of Lee for the year 1886. They state that they are possessed and jointly seized in fee of the lands assessed, and that, so far as their lands are assessed, the following is a transcript of said roll, viz.:

*124

They state that each and every of the several taxes so levied and assessed upon 'each parcel are excessive, illegal, null, and void, for the reason that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Snyder v. MarksSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. People v. HurstMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Alkan v. BeanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1877

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. City of Norwood v. HorneyOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Wikman v. City of NoviMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Old Colony Railroad v. Assessors of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  4. Nichols v. Judge of Superior CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Casco Co. v. Thurston CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1931

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API