Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Bainbridge Farm Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 16, 1931No. Nos. 8615, 8652PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.

A paper purporting to be a bill of exceptions, properly certified by the trial judge, but not signed by the plaintiff in error or his counsel, is not a legal bill of exceptions, confers no jurisdiction of the case upon this court, is not amendable to correct the defect, and will be dismissed with or without motion for that purpose. Speer v. Merryman, 56 Ga. 529; Brand v. Garrett, 62 Ga. 165; Wellborn v. Atlanta &c. R. Co., 92 Ga. 577 (17 S. E. 672); Sumner v. Sumner, 116 Ga. 798 (43 S. E. 57); O’Connell v. Friedman, 117 Ga. 949 (43 S. E. 100); Mitchell v. Tow, 147 Ga. 560 (94 S. E. 1012) ;…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lott v. City of WaycrossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  2. O'Connell Bros. v. Friedman, Keiler & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. Sumner v. SumnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  4. Speer v. O. P. Merryman & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1876
  5. Brand v. GarrettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Highway Department v. HesterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  2. Kyle v. HuietSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  3. Strange v. SlomanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  4. Henderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
  5. Studstill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API