Speer v. O. P. Merryman & Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
1. Where a bill of exceptions is signed neither by the plaintiffs in error nor their counsel, the writ of error will be dismissed. (R.)
2. Nor can this defect be cured by a proposition from counsel to sign the bill of exceptions after it has reached this court. (R.)
Practice in the Supreme Court. July Term, 1876.
When this case was called, counsel for defendant moved to dismiss the writ of error because the bill of exceptions as certified by the judge and the clerk, was signed by no one. Counsel for plaintiffs in error, to cure this omission, proposed to sign either their own names or the names…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Lott v. City of WaycrossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- O'Connell Bros. v. Friedman, Keiler & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Cook v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Sumner v. SumnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Bennett v. Bainbridge Farm Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.