Legal Opinion

Strange v. Sloman

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 11, 1957No. 19560PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Hawkins, Justice.

1. “A paper purporting to be a bill of exceptions, properly certified by the trial judge, but not signed by the plaintiff in error or his counsel, is not a legal bill of exceptions, confers no jurisdiction of the case upon this court, is not amendable to correct the defect, and will be dismissed with or without motion for that purpose.” Bennett v. Bainbridge Farm Co., 173 Ga. 856 (162 S. E. 134).

2. In the oral argument counsel for the plaintiff in error, while admitting that the bill of exceptions was not signed, contended that the court should accept in lieu thereof his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. O'Connell Bros. v. Friedman, Keiler & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Bennett v. Bainbridge Farm Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  3. Brand v. GarrettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
  4. Kyle v. HuietSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Highway Department v. HesterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API