Legal Opinion

Paul Shimek, III v. Weissman, Nowack, Curry & Wilco, P.C.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 3, 2004No. 03-14428PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff Paul Shimek, III, appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to defendant law firm Weissman, Nowack, Curry & Wilco, P.C. (“the law firm”) in this action pursuant to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692, et seq. Shimek is a homeowner and member of a homeowners association that hired the defendant law firm to collect past due fees and assessments on its behalf. Shimek alleged that the law firm, while attempting to collect a $260 fee owed by him to the homeowners association, engaged in deceptive and unfair collection practices, in violation of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. CBS Inc., Fox Broadcasting Co. v. Primetime 24 Joint VentureCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
  2. Curtis Bartlett v. John A. Heibl and John A. Heibl, Attorney at LawCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  3. Gary Smith v. Transworld Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  4. Ditty v. Checkrite, Ltd., Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 1997
  5. Sprouse v. City Credits Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Zakia Mashiri v. Epsten Grinnell & HowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. Taylor v. Heath W. Williams, L.L.C.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2007
  3. Maynard v. CannonDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2008
  4. Anderson v. Frederick J. Hanna & AssociatesDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2005
  5. Velma v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nDistrict Court, D. West Virginia · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API