Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Frederick J. Hanna & Associates
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided March 21, 2005No. CIVA104CV636MHSPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SHOOB, Senior District Judge.
This action is before the Court on plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment and defendants’ motion for summary judgment. For the following reasons, the Court grants in part and denies in part both motions.
Background
Plaintiff Caroline Anderson alleges that defendants Frederick J. Hanna & Associates (Hanna), a law firm engaged in a debt collection practice, and Dennis E. Henry, a lawyer employed by Hanna, violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq., in attempting to collect a credit card debt from her on behalf of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Frank M. OakleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Curtis Bartlett v. John A. Heibl and John A. Heibl, Attorney at LawCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Chaudhry v. GallerizzoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Taylor v. Heath W. Williams, L.L.C.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2007
- Garcia-Contreras v. Brock & Scott, PllcDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2011
- Velma v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nDistrict Court, D. West Virginia · 2013
- Sierra Club, Inc. v. LeavittDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2005