Legal Opinion

Hiller v. Smith

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 29, 1934No. Nos. 29,635, 29,754PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LORING, Justice.

David L. Hiller held a quitclaim deed to the premises in question and in 1931 filed his application to register the title under the Torrens act. The application was referred by the court to the examiner of titles for Hennepin county, as referee, as a default matter, but before the referee’s report was filed defendant answered, setting up a contract for deed to the same premises in which Hiller’s grantor, one Hodge, was the vendor and appellant the vendee. Applicant had previously in 1926 been the owner of the property in question under a conveyance from Hodge, subject to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McQuesten v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  2. Owsley v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  3. Krutz v. DodgeWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Seeger v. YoungSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. BazilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  2. Ferch v. HillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  3. McDaniel v. FingerhutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  4. In Re Application of McDaniel to Register TitleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  5. Heirs of Rood v. GibasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API